Winger, a lot of people over 5'10" or with inseams 32" or longer find the Corbin seat more comfortable than the Mustang. That is because the Mustang seat has the wrong slope front-to-back for long-legged times. Consequently they get no upper thigh support and all their upper-body weight rests solely on a small portion of their butt. For me, at 34-1/2" long inseams, even though the Mustang Wide Vintage seat is 18" wide, all my upper body weight rested on 6" wide by about 5" front-to-back of the center portion of that Mustang seat. In contrast the rounded, old-style tractor seat shape of the Corbin Dual Tour Saddle supports my butt-hips-thighs on all 14" of its width and ~9" front-to-back. With over 4 times the support area the Corbin Dual Tour Saddle is much more comfortable for me than the Mustang Wide Vintage seat. That is why I sold my Mustang after 7000 miles but I have had my Corbin for over 46,000 miles. I have no trouble on the Corbin going fill-up to fill-up, i.e 130-150 miles at a time, nor do I have trouble riding 300-600 mile days on the Corbin saddle. Depending on your body's proportions you will probably find one seat more comfortable than another. If you have very short legs, you may find that the narrow front section of the Travelcade seats lets you get your feet on the ground easier. Thus short-legged folks may be more comfortable with a Travelcade seat.

Fred